The Nation -- The Congressional ?super-committee? finally has a roster: we now know the twelve men and women tasked with cutting as much as $1.5 trillion from the federal budget, and quite possibly re-structuring entitlements and rewriting the federal tax code.
Unlike any other Congressional committee in recent memory, this ?super-committee? will wield enormous legislative power.?Their recommendations will be fast-tracked in Congress, meaning they cannot be amended and are guaranteed a simple-majority vote in the Senate. If the super-committee does not produce recommendations, or if Congress does not approve them, massive triggers will be activated: $1.5 trillion will be cut from the budget, drawing equally from defense and domestic spending.
With this much power concentrated among twelve people, K Street is revving up the money machine to help influence the decisions. ?Every lobbyist is going to go through their Rolodex to try and figure out all the connections to the twelve members of the ?super committee,?? Steve Ellis, vice president of Taxpayers for Common Sense, told Bloomberg. One Democratic lobbyist quipped to Politico that he was preparing for the super-committee ?by writing twelve really large checks.?
Legislators on both sides of the aisle are already concerned about the cannons of cash now aimed directly at the super-committee members. Republican Senators David Vitter and Dean Heller have both introduced legislation to impose transparency requirements and additional financial disclosure from members of the super-committee; in the House, Democratic Rep. Mike Quigley and Republican Rep. Jim Renacci are circulating a letter calling for, among other things, weekly disclosures from super-committee members campaign contributions and meetings with lobbyists.
Super-committee members, who were selected to represent their party, not strictly their own interests, will no doubt act for a wide variety of strategic and political reasons. But it?s still important to understand what industries are lobbying them?and which industries already have the inside track.
To that end, The Nation looked at campaign finance data from the Center for Responsive Politics for each member?Democratic Sens. John Kerry, Patty Murray, Max Baucus and Democratic Reps. Xavier Becerra, James Clyburn and Chris Van Hollen; and Republican Sens. Jon Kyl, Rob Portman, Pat Toomey and Republican Reps. Fred Upton, Dave Camp, and Jeb Hensarling.
Two areas were examined: donations from Political Action Committees, and industry donations?money from industry PACs and individuals associated with that industry. The totals are since 1998, when the data becomes available, or over the member?s career since then (in their current seat).
Political Action Committees
Democrats on the super-committee have taken over $30.6 million from PACs since 1998, and unsurprisingly the largest amount comes from labor PACs, with over $5.3 million in donations (click charts to see full size):
Reps. Clyburn and Becerra, along with Sen. Murray, have the largest labor donations, each topping $1 million. Sen. Kerry has the lowest from that group, with $267,861. The high totals for labor are typical for Democratic politicians, but may be a good sign for progressives hopeful the Democrats will stand strong against entitlement cuts, which unions strongly oppose.
The health industry is next, followed by the finance, insurance, and real estate sector? these are non-health insurance companies, commercial banks, finance and credit companies, securities and investment firms, and other big corporations typically found on Wall Street. Sen. Baucus is the heavy hitter in this category?as chair of the Senate Finance Committee, he?s raked in $1.6 million from this sector. The only other member over $1 million is Rep. Clyburn.
Note that for Democrats, both defense and agribusiness are fairly low on the list. Democrats might be more tempted to look towards farm subsidies and defense cuts when the red pens come out. Also, ?ideological/single-issue? groups are fifth on the list, but a vast majority of that money was given to Sen. Murray, and primarily by women?s groups. This money probably won?t have much bearing on the super-committee.
The Republicans on the super-committee have taken well over $24 million from just the ten largest PAC categories since 1998. By far, the largest contributor is the financial, insurance, and real estate sector?also known as Wall Street:
Rep. Jeb Hensarling has the biggest career haul from that sector, with $1,732,922 since 1998. This is not surprising, considering he has openly said that bank profits should trump consumer protection, and that recessions are ?a part of freedom.?
Health is the next category, representing largely the for-profit health industry?medical professionals, HMOs, and pharmaceutical companies. ?Ideological/single issue? PACs place fifth, with just under $2 million in contributions. That money is spread very evenly across the six members, suggesting they each are beholden to active, wealthy conservative groups. Naturally, labor is last on this list, but note that defense is second-last. The defense industry doesn?t have much money invested in this group, and none are prominent hawks.
Industry Money
The other category we examined was donations from industries. This includes both industry PACs and contributions from individual donors affiliated with a particular industry.
From their fourteen largest industry contributors, Democrats have taken in $118.4 million since 1998. Lawyers and law firms, which traditionally support Democrats, place first with over $33.5 million in donations. People who are retired are next, and of the next six categories, four represent the financial sector:
Interestingly, people who mark ?retired? on their donations are by far the largest group donating to super-committee Republicans, who collected $29.7 million from their top fourteen industries since 1998. (Like the PAC money, this is much lower than the Democratic total. But it?s important to note that Sens. Toomey and Portman are new to the Senate, while the Democrats have all been in Congress since at least 2004, most since before 1998. The data represents the money each industry has invested in the super-commmittee).
The high amount of money from retired is not totally surprising, given that Republicans are generally an older party, but the super-committee Republicans do indeed have a large number of donors who could be harmed by cuts to Medicare or Social Security.
Again, this data doesn?t provide a unifying theory of how each member will act. There are certainly larger political calculations at play. But when they start getting deep into the federal budget, removing or reducing potentially hundreds of lines, or when they attack the vastly complex tax code, there?s no doubt that special interests will come calling.
Additional research provided by Zachary Newkirk
Like this article? Try 4 issues of The Nation at home (and online) FREE.
proto proto yosemite national park google labs taylor morgan stanley mets
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.